Thursday, June 09, 2005

047: Asexuals?

Hmm... I'm remember from a while back that Details had an article similar to the one in the New York Times. Anyways, it says:
...An increasing number of people say yes [to being indiffernt to sex] and offer themselves as proof. They describe themselves as asexual, and they call their condition normal, not the result of confused sexual orientation, a fear of intimacy or a temporary lapse of desire. They would like the world to understand that they can live their entire lives happily without ever having sex.
I confess I've called myself that—asexual. Once, back in college, I've even confided to a friend—a girl—that I am an asexual because, well, I had found not one single person that I was attracted to sexually. Well, that was a lie, but back then, it wasn't so much a lie, but denial. I hadn't allowed myself to be attracted to anyone. If somehow my hormones got the better of me, the attraction was, inevitably, for a guy, the very feeling which I suppressed so well, I'm sure Opus Dei, the Spanish Inquisition, and even Apostle Paul—who advocated a celibate lifestyle—would have been proud. My attraction for a man was reinterpreted as my admiration of his character; the love I had for a man, I would say, was philia love, based on God's agape love, minus eros love. Any eros I felt in the groin was brought up to my head to be transfigured. So, naturally, it was easy for me to classify myself as an asexual.

I just hope that those who describe themselves as an asexual do so because they are sure that they are one and not because of denial.

No comments: